·¬ÇÑÉçÇø

Eligibility

Individuals named in any of the following roles during the nomination and judging period are not eligible to nominate or be nominated:

• Dalton Prize Selection Panel members
• ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø Subject Community Presidents
• ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø Prize Committee members
• Trustees of the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø of Chemistry
• ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø of Chemistry staff 

Nominators:

• Only ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø members can nominate for this prize.
• Nominees may NOT nominate themselves.

Nominees:

• The prize is open to ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø members only. This will be checked by ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø staff and the nominee’s ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø membership must be confirmed at the point of nomination – it is not sufficient to have a membership application in process.
• There are no career stage restrictions associated with this prize.
• Nominees can only be considered for one of our Research & Innovation Prizes in any given year. In a case where a nominee is nominated for more than one prize independently, ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø staff will ask the nominee which prize they would like to be considered for.
• We will not consider nominations of deceased individuals.
• We particularly encourage nominations of disabled people, those who work part-time, or whose career has spanned a break for any reason – for example, a period of parental or adoption leave, caring responsibilities, long-term illness, family commitments, or other circumstances. We understand that these can impact a nominee’s career in different ways, and encourage nominators to use the space provided on the nomination form to explain the nature and impact of the nominees’ individual circumstances (see 'Guidelines for Nominators' for further details).

General information

• When nominating previous ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø prize winners, please remember that a person cannot be awarded twice for substantially the same body of work.
• Nominees should only be nominated once for this prize in any given prize cycle. In cases where we receive more than one nomination for the same nominee, only one nomination will go forward to judging.
• All unsuccessful nominations from the previous cycle will be retained on our nomination system ahead of the next cycle. To be considered again, nominators must log in, update details, and resubmit the nomination for the following cycle. Please note that reconsideration is no longer automatic. 
  • ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø staff will write to nominators and nominees to confirm when the nomination window has re-opened. Nominators will receive instructions on how to log in and update the nomination.

Submitting your nomination

Please use our online nominations system to submit the following information:

• Your name, contact details, and ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø membership number (please contact the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø Membership team if you do not know your membership details).Your ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø membership must be confirmed at the point of nomination – it is not sufficient to have a membership application in process. The identity of nominators is not made known to our judging panels. The ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø reserves the right to amend nominations if necessary to ensure the anonymity of the nominator.
• Your nominee's name and contact details.
• An up to date CV for the nominee (no longer than one A4 side, 11pt text) which should include a summary of their education and career, and a maximum of 5 relevant publications or patents.
• Any information related to career breaks taken by your nominee - for example, a period of parental or adoption leave, caring responsibilities, long-term illness, family commitments, as well as any other circumstances including long-term conditions or disabilities. We understand that these can impact a nominee's career in different ways, and encourage nominators to use the space provided on the nomination form to explain the nature and impact of the nominee's individual circumstances. This information will be shared with the selection panel, but before doing so ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø staff will always seek consent from the nominee in cases where special category data is mentioned. 
• A short citation describing what the nominee should be awarded for. This must be no longer than 250 characters (including spaces) and no longer than one sentence.
• A supporting statement (up to 750 words) addressing the selection criteria. Our guidance for nominators page has more information on writing this supporting statement.
• A statement (up to 100 words) describing how your nominee has contributed more broadly to the scientific community. A list of possible examples is outlined in the ‘selection criteria’ tab.
• References are not required for this award and will not be accepted.

The ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø reserves the right to rescind any prize if there are reasonable grounds to do so. All nominators will be asked to confirm that to the best of their knowledge there is no impediment, relating to professional conduct, to their nominee receiving this prize. All prize winners will be asked to sign the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø’s Code of Conduct Declaration for Recognition. 

Our selection panel base their evaluations on the overall quality of relevant contributions and achievements by nominees, in relation to the selection criteria listed below.

The scientific content of any supporting publications, as described in the supporting statement, is much more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it is published.

The selection panel will consider the following aspects of nominations for this prize:

• Originality of research
• Impact of research
• Quality of publications and/or patents and/or software
• Innovation
• Professional standing
• Collaborations and teamwork
• Other indicators of esteem indicated by the nominator 

In an instance where multiple nominees are judged equally meritorious in relation to the above criteria, judging panels have the flexibility to use information provided by the nominator on the nominee’s broader contribution to the chemistry community as an additional criterion.

Examples of relevant contributions could include, but are not limited to:

• Involvement with ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø of Chemistry member groups/networks
• Teaching/demonstrating
• Effective mentorship
• Service on boards, committees or panels
• Leadership in the scientific community
• Peer-reviewer
• Promotion of diversity and inclusion
• Advocacy for chemistry
• Public engagement and outreach

This prize was created in 2020, as part of a series of changes following an independent review of the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø of Chemistry's recognition programmes. 

The Mond-Nyholm Prize for Inorganic Chemistry merges the Ludwig Mond Award (which ran between 1981 and 2020) and the Nyholm Prize for Inorganic Chemistry (which ran between 1974 and 2020). Click through for more information about these two prizes, including lists of previous winners. 

Ludwig Mond

Born in 1839 in Cassel, Germany, Ludwig Mond studied chemistry at the University of Marburg under Hermann Kolbe (known for his synthesis of salicylic acid) and the University of Heidelberg under Robert Bunsen. In 1862, he moved to England where, during his employment with Messrs. Hutchinson & Earle, he improved the Leblanc soda process to recover sulphur that was usually lost in waste. 1864 saw Mond return to Germany where he erected an alkali works at Utrecht. Nine years later, however, he was back in England to erect an alkali works near Northwich, in partnership with J.T. Brunner.

Mond's scientific work resulted in the improvement of many processes (for example, recovering lost ammonia and chlorine) and the development of new processes. He developed a system for gas production from bituminous slack (coal fragments and dust) for use in lighting, heating, and internal combustion engines. Working with Carl Lange and Friedrich Quincke he discovered the carbonyl compounds (including nickel carbonyl), a discovery that formed the basis for nickel manufacture.

Mond made significant financial contributions to support the application of scientific research, founding the Royal Institution's Davy-Faraday Laboratory and funding the production of the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø's International Catalogue of Scientific Literature.

The Ludwig Mond Award was established in 1981 through an endowment from ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries). In 2021, the purposes of this Trust were amended, and remaining monies were combined with other generous bequests and donations to become part of the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø Recognition Fund.

Ronald Nyholm

Sir Ronald Nyholm was president of the Chemical Society from 1968 to 1970. He was born in New South Wales, Australia and his work centred on coordination (metal complex) chemistry, particular on arsines as ligands. 

Alongside his research activities in this area, he was also an ardent campaigner for the improvement of science education. He undertook roles as a chemistry teacher and lecturer in various institutions in both the UK and Australia. Whilst involved with the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø of Chemistry, he played a large and leading role in the launch of the ·¬ÇÑÉçÇø's publication, Education in Chemistry.

The Prize was formerly known as the Sir Ronald Nyholm Lectureship, and was awarded by the Education and Dalton Division in alternate years. The Nyholm Prize for Education continues to reward outstanding achievements in education.